Рoetics of Psychologism in World Women's Prose
Keywords:
women's prose, psychologism, autobiographical notes, marriage and family, peace of mindAbstract
The article attempts to reveal the ideological and artistic range of the "female theme" in the prose of modern Russian and English writers. L. Petrushevskaya, M. Paley, N. Gorlanova, H. Fielding, S. Townsend and M. Spark are quite well-known modern writers whose names are involuntarily united, being a common theme, the concept of the hero, some literary techniques of highly artistic women's prose. At the same time, each of them has its own system of literary associations and preferences. The purpose of the article is to review these particular topics.
Materials and methods
This topic is relevant at all times. The problems of the family have been studied by many scientists and writers.The object of the study was the works of modern Russian and English writers The subject of the study was the methods of artistic psychologism in Russian, Uzbek and English, American "women's prose". The purpose of the study is to study the uniqueness of artistic psychologism and their embodiment of family problems, family relations in "women's prose" Research objectives:- study and systematization of materials on the problem, determination of the degree of its study in science;- definition of the main problems of family relations in modern prose of the twentieth century Research methods: comparative, historical and literary, analytical.
Research results
Penetration into the depths of women's psychology is the main feature of modern women's prose of the turn of the XX–XXI centuries without division by nationality. Despite the difference in mentality, in the prose of Russian, Uzbek and English writers, the problems of moral order are harmoniously connected with social ones.
Conclusions
The study of research materials on the problem, the analysis of works of modern Russian and English "women's prose" show the relevance of the problem in modern society. Of particular importance are the disclosures of internal psychologism in modern conditions, characterized, among other things, by the conflict between the objective needs of society and social conditions. In society, there is a constant understanding of the problems of revealing the psychology of a person and his place in the family at the level of the state and society.
References
Abasheva M. Chisten'kaya jizn' ne pomnyashikh zla // Literaturnoe obozrenie. – 1992. – № 5–6. – S. 9–14.
Borovikov S. Neizvestnaya zarya. Resenziya na knigu Marini Paley «Mestorojdenie vetra» // Noviy mir. – 1998. – № 12. – S. 222–226. V mire nauki i iskusstva: voprosi filologii, iskusstvovedeniya i kul'turologii www.sibac.info № 11 (54), 2015 g. 164
Paley M.A. Otdelenie propavshikh. – M.: Moskovskiy rabochiy, 1991. – 224 s.
Spark M. Peredel. Posobniki i podstrekateli. Romani. – M.: Tranzitkniga, 2004. – 336 s.
Taunsend S. Publichnie priznaniya jenshini srednix let v vozraste 55 i ¾ let. Roman. – M.: «Fantom Press», 2013. – 384 s.
Filding X. Bridjit Djons bez uma ot mal'chishki. Roman. – M.: Eksmo, 2014. – 640 s.
Zul'fiya Kuralboy kizi. Sbornik rasskazov «Qadimiy qo‘shiq». (). - T.: Uzbekistan, 2012.S.161-162
Doreski, C. K. Didion, Joan 1934—. American Writers, Supplement 4, edited by A Walton Litz and Molly Weigel, vol. 1, Charles Scribner's Sons, 1996, pp. 195-216. Gale Virtual Reference Library.
Joan Didion. Encyclopedia of World Biography, 2nd ed., vol. 20, Gale, 2004, pp. 113-116. Gale Virtual Reference Library.
Doreski, C. K. Didion, Joan 1934—. American Writers, Supplement 4, edited by A Walton Litz and Molly Weigel, vol. 1, Charles Scribner's Sons, 1996, pp. 195-216. Gale Virtual Reference Library.
McKinley, Jesse. Joan Didion's New Book Faces Tragedy. New York Times, 29 August 2005.
Murtazaeva F. R. Psychologism as a stylish dominant in the modern female prose of v. tokareva //Theoretical & Applied Science. – 2019. – №. 10. – С. 717-720.
Murtazaeva F. R Женское видение мира в прозе В.Токаревой. «Своя правда» / Ф. Р. Муртазаева. — Текст : непосредственный // Молодой ученый. — 2020. — № 4 (294). — С. 462-465. — URL: https://moluch.ru/archive/294/66823/ (дата обращения: 10.04.2022).
Murtazaeva F. R. Philosophy of “female prose” //Scientific reports of Bukhara State University. – 2020. – Т. 3. – №. 3. – С. 195-195.
Murtazaeva F. R., Пардаева З. Ж. Теоретические аспекты исследования творчества Виктории Токаревой //Modern Humanities Success. – 2020. – №. 2. – С. 272-276.
