Peer Coaching as an Effective Tool in Teaching Development
Keywords:
coaching, peer coaching, leadership, leadership development, experiential learning, self-learning, action learningAbstract
This report reflects on the experience of conducting peer coaching for improvement of teaching practices and student learning. Peer coaching was first conducted by the Science Department offering Cambridge A-Level Programme on two Semester One classes. The observed lesson was targeted on engaging students through collaborative learning. Another experience on peer coaching was conducted by a group of teachers from different subjects and programmes, and targeted on learning by using formative assessment. The model attempted was the collegial peer coaching, and it included three main processes: pre-observation planning and discussion, two consecutive peer observations, and post-observation discussion. Peer coaching was found to be an impactful tool for professional development, because it offers teachers the opportunity for self-reflection, sharing of classroom experience, and mutual growth in teaching
References
Annette Thijs, Ellen van den Berg. (2002). Peer coaching as part of a professional development program for science teachers in Botswana. International Journal of Educational Development. vol. 22. pp 55–68.
Harris, B. M. Robbins. Becker. (1986). Developmental teacher evaluation. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
Allison, S. and Harbour, M. (2009) The Coaching Toolkit: A Practical Guide for Your School. London: Sage
Bresser, F. and Wilson, C. (2010) in Excellence in coaching: The industry guide. 2nd ed. London: Kogan Page
Green, L.S., Grant, A.M. and Rynsaardt, J. (2007). Evidence-based life coaching for senior high school students: Building hardiness and hope. International Coaching Psychology Review, 2(1). 24-32
Hawkins, P. and Smith, N. (2006) Coaching, mentoring and organizational consultancy: Supervision and development. Maidenhead: Open University Press
Joyce, B. and Flowers, B. (1996) ‘The Evolution of Peer Coaching’. Educational Leadership, 53 (6): 12–16