Legal Regulation of Electronic Arbitration: Recognition and Execution of its Decisions

Authors

  • Mokhinur Bakhramova Senior lecturer at Intellectual property law department, Tashkent state university of law, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

Keywords:

New York Convention (NYC), arbitration laws, court decisions, artificial intelligence, Covid-19 pandemy, E-ARB, International Arbitration Center

Abstract

As part of this article, we will examine the question of the fact that the states should adapt their Arbitration laws to adapt arbitrates in artificial intellect or complete autonomous arbitrations. We also study the dynamics of regulation and regulation competition. Although countries are formal free in principle not to accept or not accept their unique arbitration legislation, they may be pressured in a particular direction by market forces. The states competed for arbitration business, and such competition can encourage them to renew and modernize Arbitration laws, which makes them more comfortable for technology and AI.Countries independently cannot change the New York Convention. Nevertheless, they can decide whether semi-empty or without modification or without changes or copy arbitration of another state or develop a new arbitral charter from zero.

References

Schiavetta, Susan, “The Relationship Betweene-AD Rand Article 6 of the European Convention of Human Rights pursuant to the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights “, 2004 (1) The Journal of Information, Law and Technology (JILT). <http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/law/elj/jilt/2004_1/schiavetta/

Van den Heuvel, Esther, Online Dispute Resolution as solution to cross border e-disputes, p.15 http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/63/57/1878940.pdf

Schellekens, M.H.M., “Online Arbitration and E-commerce”, Electronic communication law Revue. Nr.9, Kluwer Law international

VanHof,JacomijnJ.,CommentaryontheUNCITRALarbitrationrules.TheapplicationbytheIran-U.S.Claims Tribunal, Kluwer law and taxation,1991

St.John Sutton, David, etal, Russellon Arbitration, 23rd edition, Sweet&Maxwell, Limited, London,2007

Trcek, Dennis, “Minimising the risk of electronic document forgery”, Computer Standards & Interfaces, Volume 19, Issue 2, March 1998

Bakhramova, Mokhinur. "LEGAL STATUS OF INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTIONS SPECIALIZED IN RESOLUTION OF ODR DISPUTES." Euro-Asia Conferences. 2022.http://papers.euroasiaconference.com/index.php/eac/article/view/594

Bahramovna, Bahramova Mohinur. "ONLAYN ARBITRAJDA NIZOLARNI HAL ETISH TARTIBI." International Journal of Philosophical Studies and Social Sciences (2022): 104-109.http://www.ijpsss.iscience.uz/index.php/ijpsss/article/view/238

Schultz,T.Kaufmann-Kohler,G.Langer,D.,Bonnet,V.OnlineDisputeResolution:TheStateoftheArtandthe Issues,E-ComResearchProjectoftheUniversityofGeneva,Geneva,2001,http://www.online-adr.org.

Bahramovna, Bahramova Mohinur. "RAQAMLI MAKONDA ONLAYN NIZOLAR TUSHUNCHASI VA ULARNING HUQUQIY MAQOMI." БАРҚАРОРЛИК ВА ЕТАКЧИ ТАДҚИҚОТЛАР ОНЛАЙН ИЛМИЙ ЖУРНАЛИ (2022): 163-168.http://sciencebox.uz/index.php/jars/article/view/1634

Shenton, David, W. “Supplementary rules governing the presentation and reception of evidence in international commercial arbitration” in Lew, Julian (editor), Contemporary problems in International Arbitration, Centre for Commercial Law Studies, Queen Mary College, 1986

Mokhinur, Bakhramova. "NECESSITY AND IMPORTANCE OF ELECTRONIC DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN INTERNATIONAL LAW." Збірникнауковихпраць SCIENTIA (2021).https://scholar.google.com/scholar?cluster=18030531839024872669&hl=en&oi=scholarr

Published

2022-04-23

How to Cite

Bakhramova, M. . (2022). Legal Regulation of Electronic Arbitration: Recognition and Execution of its Decisions. European Multidisciplinary Journal of Modern Science, 5, 412–415. Retrieved from https://emjms.academicjournal.io/index.php/emjms/article/view/290

Issue

Section

Articles